From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: implement autosuspend
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:25:51 -0700
Message-ID: <20100728212551.GA20508@kroah.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1007281702030.1744-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
 <1280351785.30808.603.camel@mulgrave.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:35599 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751806Ab0G1V0V (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:26:21 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1280351785.30808.603.camel@mulgrave.site>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, USB Storage list <usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:16:25PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 17:12 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Because this patch depends on those SCSI changes, either it should also 
> > go via James's tree or else the SCSI patches should be imported into 
> > Greg's tree first.  James and Greg, which route is easier for you?
> 
> They're USB patches, so they should be in a USB tree.  Just do a
> standard postmerge tree based on SCSI.

Yeah, but then for now my tree will not build on its own, right?

thanks,

greg k-h