From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (scsi-post-merge tree related) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:51:25 -0400 Message-ID: <201008022051.26695.konrad@kernel.org> References: <20100803024445.0bf7ec86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100802195940.GC32503@andromeda.dapyr.net> <1280780042.2843.628.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1280780042.2843.628.camel@mulgrave.site> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Mike Christie , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jayamohan Kallickal , Randy Dunlap , linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > 2). Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk for the > > the part that puts in drivers/scsi and will make it now under James' > > mainternship. > > > > James, > > > > I've asked Linus to pull my iBFT tree before yours as there was this > > dependency. Are you OK putting this patch in your tree, or would you > > prefer that I expunge Mike's patch from mine? > > I can put this patch into my post merge tree. I suspect you having a > post-post-merge tree (needed for the build problems) might be a bit > overkill ... > > James OK. Thanks.