From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove LUNs that no longer exist when we scan a target with REPORT LUNS. Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:58:22 -0400 Message-ID: <201008161058.23562.konrad@darnok.org> References: <1281917313-1855-1-git-send-email-realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> <201008160945.01369.konrad@darnok.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from andromeda.dapyr.net ([206.212.254.10]:37530 "EHLO andromeda.dapyr.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754790Ab0HPRos (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:44:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Sharpe Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > >> Tested by adding four LUNs with scst_local and then deleting them in > >> various combinations, including deleting from LUN 0, deleting from last > >> LUN and deleting in the middle out. > > > > What happens if you stack the device? Say you got multipath on top of > > this or device-mapper? Does this work properly ? For multipath I would > > expect it to work OK, and multipath device would queue the I/O until a > > LUN with the same SCSI_ID would reappear. > > I do not know :-) > > Let me test this situation to find out. Cool. Thanks.