From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Linux I/O subsystem performance Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:40:09 -0600 Message-ID: <20100824204009.GS12892@parisc-linux.org> References: <1282508953.3042.102.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C727BEB.9020100@scalableinformatics.com> <20100824072557.GK2804@reaktio.net> <4C73DA91.9040101@vlnb.net> <20100824145522.GQ12892@parisc-linux.org> <4C7406AA.7080308@vlnb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58721 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753113Ab0HXUkL (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:40:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C7406AA.7080308@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: Pasi K?rkk?inen , Chetan Loke , Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , scst-devel On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:51:38PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Matthew Wilcox, on 08/24/2010 06:55 PM wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: >>> Also it looks very suspicious why nobody even tried to match that >>> Microsoft/Intel record, even Intel itself who closely works with Linux >>> community in the storage area and could do it using the same hardware. >> >> You seem to be under the impression that "Intel" is some monolithic >> entity. Despite working with six different storage& performance >> groups within Intel, I have no idea what record you're referring to, >> nor what hardware it was accomplished with. > > It is > http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million Ah, iSCSI. I don't work with that group. I'm a bit too busy with other projects to pursue a relationship with them right now :-) -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."