From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?unknown-8bit?B?SvxyZ2VuIEUu?= Fischer Subject: Re: Why is AHA152X_CS !64BIT? Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100909200101.GA19568@linux-buechse.de> References: <4C72D310.4040004@suse.cz> <4C7B924D.6030703@panasas.com> <201009071712.54867.konrad@darnok.org> <4C86B1A4.8030308@oracle.com> <4C86B320.8090709@oracle.com> <1283897409.22844.7.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C86B9A6.2050808@suse.cz> Reply-To: fischer@linux-buechse.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49285 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753505Ab0IIUBG (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:01:06 -0400 Received: from elrond.intern.linux-buechse.de (fischer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux-buechse.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.2) with ESMTP id o89K12Gt020053 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:01:02 +0200 Received: (from fischer@localhost) by elrond.intern.linux-buechse.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o89K11ur020052 for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:01:01 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C86B9A6.2050808@suse.cz> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiri, On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 00:16:06 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > As I wrote few minutes ago, there is only one which is in print. And I > cannot find anybody fixing anything similar since 2.1. > So can we enable it on 64-bit when we have two reports it works on > 64-bit? (Is it still maintained? MAINTAINERS says so...) For the maintainance: My ISA machine is defunct, but I still have a PCMCIA card to test and debug it needed - although no 64bit machine with a PCMCIA slot. I suppose the hardware is so hardly used nowadays, that there simply hasn't been any need for aha152x specific changes (or debugging) for years. And all the interface updates were done by whoever changed the generic interface and I eventually ceased to follow. So I guess the maintainance state should be changed to "Odd fixes" at best. Juergen