linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi_dh_alua: add missing transitioning state support
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:29:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922122901.GA10218@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C99D6B3.3090003@suse.de>



On Wed, Sep 22 2010 at  6:13am -0400,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:

> Mike Christie wrote:
> > On 09/21/2010 02:33 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> 2) the patch also modified alua_rtpg() so implicit ALUA would retry
> >>     (just like explicit ALUA currently does) if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING
> >>     - so why should we avoid retry for implicit but do it for explicit?
> > 
> > Leaving that for Hannes. I cannot think of a reason. Probably just did
> > not do it.
> 
> Finally I got around to answering this.
> 
> I've attached a patch which I made the other day which seems to work
> reasonably well.
> Looks better from my side, so if you agree I'll be sending it
> upstream properly.

Looks good for covering this "2)" change above.

But "1)" change you had concern with (in my previous patch) was that
alua_prep_fn would return BLKPREP_DEFER if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING.
This was bad in that FS requests (like the directio path checker) would
always call ->prep_fn and that if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING the RTPG
state would never be reevaluated.. leaving us stuck in BLKPREP_DEFER.

Seems I'm missing a new flow that proves this is no longer a concern.

Please advise, thanks.
Mike

> From d3f02c90db3e3177309b78726d082e17dd772ee2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:09:07 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: Handle all states correctly
> 
> For ALUA we should be handling all states, independent of whether
> is explicit or implicit. For 'Transitioning' we should be retry
> for a certain amount of time; after that an error should be
> returned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 1a970a7..c6f57e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
...
> @@ -698,8 +704,11 @@ static int alua_prep_fn(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
>  	struct alua_dh_data *h = get_alua_data(sdev);
>  	int ret = BLKPREP_OK;
>  
> -	if (h->state != TPGS_STATE_OPTIMIZED &&
> -	    h->state != TPGS_STATE_NONOPTIMIZED) {
> +	if (h->state == TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING)
> +		ret = BLKPREP_DEFER;
> +	else if (h->state != TPGS_STATE_OPTIMIZED &&
> +		 h->state != TPGS_STATE_NONOPTIMIZED &&
> +		 h->state != TPGS_STATE_LBA_DEPENDENT) {
>  		ret = BLKPREP_KILL;
>  		req->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
>  	}


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-22 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-17 19:05 [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: add missing transitioning state support Mike Snitzer
2010-08-17 19:23 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-08-30  9:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-31 15:11     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-20 15:35       ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-21  2:27         ` Mike Christie
2010-09-21  2:28           ` Mike Christie
2010-09-21 19:33           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-21 21:14             ` Mike Christie
2010-09-22 10:13               ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-09-22 12:29                 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-09-23  7:15                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-09-23 13:44                     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-23 18:53                       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100922122901.GA10218@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).