From: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: set the bounce_pfn to the actual DMA limit rather than to max memory
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:20:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100924192059.GA550@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9CEDE5.902@fusionio.com>
Jens Axboe [jaxboe@fusionio.com] wrote:
> > This patch also _fixed_ our problem. So we are fine with either patch,
> > but this patch is preferred as it enables more request merges. Also,
> > both patches maybe needed for some configurations.
>
> Plus it doesn't needlessly bounce, that's the real problem you want to
> fix. I have applied this thread patch to for-2.6.37/core, thanks.
There is a shortcut check in blk_queue_bounce() that uses blk_max_pfn to
return without doing anything. blk_max_pfn is not updated when we do
hot-plug memory add, so bounce buffers are NOT really used in our case
(thankfully)!
Here is the code that may need some fix in future:
if (!(q->limits.bounce_gfp & GFP_DMA)) {
if (queue_bounce_pfn(q) >= blk_max_pfn)
return;
Thank you so much for applying this patch.
Thanks, Malahal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 22:22 [PATCH] block: set the bounce_pfn to the actual DMA limit rather than to max memory Malahal Naineni
2010-09-22 23:06 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-09-24 13:58 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-24 17:05 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-09-24 18:28 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-24 19:20 ` Malahal Naineni [this message]
2010-09-24 19:26 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-01 2:30 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-10-01 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-28 22:13 Luck, Tony
2010-09-28 22:59 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-09-28 23:40 ` Luck, Tony
2010-09-29 0:42 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-09-29 4:47 ` Luck, Tony
2010-09-29 5:55 ` Malahal Naineni
2010-09-29 16:00 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100924192059.GA550@us.ibm.com \
--to=malahal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).