From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:57:55 -0800 Message-ID: <20101227115755.ffcdfc4f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20101227170451.a9a9f873.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101227170451.a9a9f873.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , nab@kernel.org, scsi Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly] > > Changes since 20101221: > > Linus' tree lost its build failure. Hi Nick, Please test building target code when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled. When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, drivers/target/ gets a boat load of build errors. Should TCM_IBLOCK depend on BLOCK? That fixes lots of the build errors, but not all of them. The header file include/target/target_core_base.h uses struct queue_limits, so it should #include . --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/