Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Why using configfs as the only interface is wrong for a storage target
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:53:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110207225300.GD13518@noexit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110207224407.GC13518@noexit>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:44:09PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> 	It's great that Nick has fancy tools to fly around the target
> configfs space, but that's all fluff for people writing and debugging

	I'm glad that Nick is excited about what configfs provides him
as a developer examining the system, but I think he goes overboard
extolling these virtues.  This distracts from the core discussion of
configfs as a method of communicating the configuration to kernelspace.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #207

	"Swing for the fence."

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@evilplan.org

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-07 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 11:41 Why using configfs as the only interface is wrong for a storage target Bart Van Assche
2011-02-07 11:53 ` Joel Becker
2011-02-07 12:08   ` Bart Van Assche
2011-02-07 19:57     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-07 14:41   ` James Bottomley
2011-02-07 15:02     ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-07 20:09       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-07 21:38         ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-07 22:44           ` Joel Becker
2011-02-07 22:53             ` Joel Becker [this message]
2011-02-08  0:03             ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-08  8:01             ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-07 15:10     ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-09-16  7:34       ` Sergiu
2011-02-07 18:45     ` Joel Becker
2011-02-07 20:01 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110207225300.GD13518@noexit \
    --to=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox