From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: fcoe: correct checking for bonding Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110314.140446.183042229.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110314192201.GA2873@psychotron.redhat.com> <20110314.132007.193707878.davem@davemloft.net> <1300136015.31662.13.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46122 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755511Ab1CNVEI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:04:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1300136015.31662.13.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Bottomley@suse.de Cc: jpirko@redhat.com, robert.w.love@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devel@open-fcoe.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com, joe.eykholt@gmail.com From: James Bottomley Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:53:35 -0500 > That said, I think we're pretty close to the end of the patch series > for the merge window and it's a simple patch, so as long as it > applies to net-next, I think we have an pretty low probability for > non trivial merges. You can do it with my and Rob's acked-by. Ok, thanks.