From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] tcm_loop: Add multi-fabric Linux/SCSI LLD fabric
	module
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:58:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20110314145808.GA28480@lst.de>
References: <1300100775-10012-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <1300100775-10012-22-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1300100775-10012-22-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:06:15AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>  drivers/target/Kconfig                         |    2 +
>  drivers/target/Makefile                        |    3 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/Kconfig                |   11 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/Makefile               |    5 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_configfs.c    |  643 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_core.h        |  141 ++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric.c      |  472 +++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c |  574 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 1851 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Please descide on a naming scheme for the frontend modules.  You have
tcm_loop for thise one, and just iscsi for the iscsi frontend.  I'm
not sure what tcm actually stands for, but a common prefix defintively
is helpful.

And for only about 1700 lines of code I really don't see why it needs to be
split into multiple implementation files.