From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110329202904.GG7184@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com>
On Tue 29-03-11 07:16:32, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 12:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> (3) The union mount versus overlayfs debate - pros and cons. What each do well,
> what needs doing. Do we want/need both upstream? (Maybe this can get 10 minutes
> in Al's VFS session?)
It might be interesting but neither Miklos nor Val seems to be attending
so I'm not sure how deep discussion we can have :).
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29 11:16 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-29 12:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-29 13:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 13:38 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 17:20 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 18:10 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:13 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 20:12 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 23:09 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 5:58 ` [Lsf] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:26 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 15:33 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 15:46 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 20:32 ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-03-30 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 19:47 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-03-29 20:29 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-03-29 20:31 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 0:33 ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-30 2:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 11:13 ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-30 11:28 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 14:07 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01 15:19 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-01 16:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:46 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-02 3:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:43 ` Joel Becker
2011-03-30 21:49 ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-31 0:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-31 1:00 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:34 ` Mingming Cao
2011-04-01 21:49 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110329202904.GG7184@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).