From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:29:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20110329202904.GG7184@quack.suse.cz> References: <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site> <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ric Wheeler Cc: James Bottomley , lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel , device-mapper development , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue 29-03-11 07:16:32, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 03/29/2011 12:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > (3) The union mount versus overlayfs debate - pros and cons. What each do well, > what needs doing. Do we want/need both upstream? (Maybe this can get 10 minutes > in Al's VFS session?) It might be interesting but neither Miklos nor Val seems to be attending so I'm not sure how deep discussion we can have :). Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR