From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] isci: remove base_request abstraction Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:11:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20110401131113.GB27181@infradead.org> References: <20110328000754.GA28347@infradead.org> <20110328132046.GA497@infradead.org> <20110328132114.GB11684@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37938 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753487Ab1DANLO (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:11:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Christoph Hellwig , dave.jiang@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jacek.danecki@intel.com, ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com, edmund.nadolski@intel.com On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > We'll want to do a tree-wide s/sci_base_/sci_/, but maybe not until we > settle on the final unified object names... put it off for now. I don't think much of the sci_base names will be left, basically just the core state machine helpers.