From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dmilburn@redhat.com" <dmilburn@redhat.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
"Danecki, Jacek" <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
"Skirvin, Jeffrey D" <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>,
"Wojcik, Artur" <artur.wojcik@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] isci: simplify dma coherent allocation
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:44:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110413164425.GA4279@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302676349.30034.36.camel@dwillia2-linux>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks. We can do this a bit simpler and just move ram initialization
> completely out of the start path, where it does not really belong.
>
> I'll fold the fix below into the patch.
That looks much better than the initial version. I'm still not sure
there actually is much of a point of doing a lot of work in the
start state handler. Is there any fundamental reason for delaying work
from the normal init path?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 23:55 [PATCH, RFC] isci: simplify dma coherent allocation Edmund Nadolski
2011-04-13 6:32 ` Dan Williams
2011-04-13 16:44 ` hch [this message]
2011-04-13 19:44 ` Dan Williams
2011-04-13 23:41 ` Dan Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-02 12:15 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110413164425.GA4279@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=artur.wojcik@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).