From: "Kashyap, Desai" <kashyap.desai@lsi.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com,
Sathya.Prakash@lsi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: removetheuseofwriteq@lsi.com, since writeq is not atomic
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:33:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504110317.GA17855@lsi.com> (raw)
The following code seems to be there in /usr/src/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h.
This is not going to work.
static inline void writeq(__u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
writel(val, addr);
writel(val >> 32, addr+4);
}
So with this code turned on in the kernel, there is going to be race condition
where multiple cpus can be writing to the request descriptor at the same time.
Meaning this could happen:
(A) CPU A doest 32bit write
(B) CPU B does 32 bit write
(C) CPU A does 32 bit write
(D) CPU B does 32 bit write
We need the 64 bit completed in one access pci memory write, else spin lock is required.
Since it's going to be difficult to know which writeq was implemented in the kernel,
the driver is going to have to always acquire a spin lock each time we do 64bit write.
Cc: stable@kernle.org
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@lsi.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c
index efa0255..5778334 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c
@@ -1558,7 +1558,6 @@ mpt2sas_base_free_smid(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u16 smid)
* care of 32 bit environment where its not quarenteed to send the entire word
* in one transfer.
*/
-#ifndef writeq
static inline void _base_writeq(__u64 b, volatile void __iomem *addr,
spinlock_t *writeq_lock)
{
@@ -1570,13 +1569,6 @@ static inline void _base_writeq(__u64 b, volatile void __iomem *addr,
writel((u32)(data_out >> 32), (addr + 4));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(writeq_lock, flags);
}
-#else
-static inline void _base_writeq(__u64 b, volatile void __iomem *addr,
- spinlock_t *writeq_lock)
-{
- writeq(cpu_to_le64(b), addr);
-}
-#endif
/**
* mpt2sas_base_put_smid_scsi_io - send SCSI_IO request to firmware
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-04 11:03 Kashyap, Desai [this message]
2011-05-04 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: removetheuseofwriteq@lsi.com, since writeq is not atomic Desai, Kashyap
2011-05-04 19:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-05-05 6:59 ` Desai, Kashyap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110504110317.GA17855@lsi.com \
--to=kashyap.desai@lsi.com \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Sathya.Prakash@lsi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox