From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/42 RESEND+NEW] Target updates for May 27
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:56:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530125604.GA15449@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE1AE2F.70705@redhat.com>
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 07:23:43PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> I guess this is my fault for not CCing linux-scsi. I'm working on tcm
> cleanups and have been sending them to linux-iscsi-target-dev, because
> there are a lot of them. Aren't you guys on that list too?
I'm not on it. In fact I didn't really know about it until known.
I'll take all my complains back in that case, my fault for not beeing
on the proper list.
> In any case, here's my git tree for review hch, I've been developing
> against nab's lio-41, under the perhaps mistaken assumption that it all
> would go in and then patched up to snuff:
>
> git://fedorapeople.org/home/fedora/grover/public_git/linux-2.6.git for-nab
Looks pretty good, and removes a few items from my todo list.
Some comments on the patches:
"target: get_cdb should never return NULL":
looks good by itself, but I think the real fix here is to not
leave the CDB allocation to the I/O backend, but just include
it in the se_task. Or maybe even in the se_cmd once that
whole CDB splitting mess is moved into pscsi, which will
simplify the common code further,
"target: inline struct se_transport_task into struct se_task"
The description is wrong, it's moved into the se_cmd, which
is the correct thing to do anyway.
"target: Rename transport_generic_handle_cdb to _new_cmd"
About the naming: For now it's transport_generic for exported
APIs I think. IMHO it's a pretty bad choice and should be
replaced by target_, but let's do that in one big sweep.
"target: Have iscsi fabric allocate its own buffers"
ceil seems to be a reimplementation of DIV_ROUND_UP from
kernel.h
"target/iscsi: Do not use t_mem_list anymore"
Very nice cleanup!
"target: Call transport_new_cmd instead of adding to cmd queue"
Did you test all other frontends that they are fine with this
change?
Also the code really needs to handle errors from transport_new_cmd.
The comment above transport_generic_new_cmd needs an update,
or even better the wrapper should be killed and callers should
use transport_new_cmd directly.
The TRANSPORT_NEW_CMD enum value and code switch case in
transport_processing_thread cab be removed now.
Btw, it seems like transport_processing_thread and the various
helpers to queue up work to it could be nicely cleaned up
by using a workqueue with a work item embedded into the
se_cmd. That way this work could a) be made to scale to
multiple CPUs, and b) we could kill new_cmd_map by just
allowing the frontend to setup their own work queue handlers
instead of going through this abstraction.
"target/file: Alloc iov[] off the stack"
We can get pretty large iovecs, and blindly allocation them on
the stack seems like a bad idea. It might make sense to do
so for the fast path, which means we'd need a __fd_do_readv
that gets the vector passed, and then a smart wrapper using
the stack for small vectors, and some technic making sure
gcc doesn't bloat the stack otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1306523240-15543-1-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-27 22:15 ` [PATCH 0/42 RESEND+NEW] Target updates for May 27 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-27 22:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-27 23:39 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-28 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-28 19:09 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-29 2:23 ` Andy Grover
2011-05-30 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
[not found] ` <1306523240-15543-11-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-31 7:08 ` [PATCH 10/42] target: Rewrite transport_init_task_sg() Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-31 21:04 ` Andy Grover
2011-05-31 21:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-01 0:33 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
[not found] ` <1306523240-15543-38-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-31 9:00 ` [PATCH 37/42] target/iscsi: Do not use t_mem_list anymore Nicholas A. Bellinger
[not found] ` <1306523240-15543-40-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-31 9:32 ` [PATCH 39/42] target: Call transport_new_cmd instead of adding to cmd queue Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-31 9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 10:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-31 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 11:22 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-31 10:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 11:18 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-06-01 4:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-04 2:33 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-06-04 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <1306523240-15543-42-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-31 9:58 ` [PATCH 41/42] target/iscsi: remove unsolicited_data_comp completion Nicholas A. Bellinger
[not found] ` <1306523240-15543-43-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com>
2011-05-31 10:59 ` [PATCH 42/42] target/file: Alloc iov[] off the stack Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110530125604.GA15449@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox