From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iscsi-target: Merge for .40-rc1
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:09:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530130949.GB13494@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimt5qisV7EH7NMv1tG8gR_9d-kA3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:49:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't feel confident or motivated enough about iscsi-target, so
> after some (little) thought I ended up not pulling this. I really need
> a lot of acks from people who actually work on and care about SCSI,
> and right now I feel like with me being away for the next week, I
> can't handle it.
>
> I just don't want to be in the situation where I pull something that
> is apparently contentious in the SCSI space in general, but that's
> _particularly_ true this release. So I'm afraid that this essentially
> got pushed out to the next release.
The main contention right now is wether to put the authentification
into kernel space or not. Doing the slow path in userspace worked
out okay but not great on the initiator, but it has the potential
to become a nightmare worse than oprofile if the split ends up not
beeing perfect.
Given that we pretty well tested and working code that's used in lots
of production setups my vote is for taking it as-is unless someone can
actually show a prototype for a nicely working user/kernel split.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-28 2:59 [GIT PULL] iscsi-target: Merge for .40-rc1 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-29 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-29 20:58 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-05-30 13:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-05-30 15:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2011-05-31 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 10:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2011-06-18 16:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-06-24 16:36 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-25 23:15 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110530130949.GB13494@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox