From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iscsi-target: Merge for .40-rc1 Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:19:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20110531101947.GA31648@lst.de> References: <1306551592.23461.506.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20110530130949.GB13494@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Mike Christie , Andy Grover , James Bottomley , linux-scsi , LKML List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Given that we pretty well tested and working code that's used in lots > > of production setups my vote is for taking it as-is unless someone can > > actually show a prototype for a nicely working user/kernel split. > > As far as I know such a user/kernel split has been implemented in both > IET and SCST and is working fine in both of these projects. Which are unrelated codebases - if you want to offer a competing iSCSI implementation for the core target framework we have in mainline based on the codebase go ahead. > And here is another issue that still hasn't been resolved yet: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129707890023739&w=2. This is related to the software iSCSI fronted in what way?