From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iscsi-target: Handle transport_generic_new_cmd failure Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:00:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20110604140036.GA13359@lst.de> References: <1307150298-23921-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <1307150298-23921-5-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:57238 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756407Ab1FDOAh (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:00:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307150298-23921-5-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Andy Grover , Christoph Hellwig , target-devel , linux-scsi On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:18:15PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > + ret = transport_generic_new_cmd(&cmd->se_cmd); > + if ((ret < 0) || (SE_CMD(cmd)->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SE_CMD_FAILED)) { No need for the inner braces. Also SCF_SE_CMD_FAILED won't ever be set if you call transport_generic_new_cmd, so no need to check it.