From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>,
Neerav Parikh <Neerav.Parikh@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/12] fcoe: Rearrange fcoe port and NPIV port cleanup
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:59:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110620235951.1777.57649.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620235848.1777.5168.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
From: Neerav Parikh <neerav.parikh@intel.com>
When NPIV port destroy handler is called it does not do all the cleanup
required for the given NPIV port. This was happening as some of the
lport cleanup moved to fcoe_interface_cleanup() routine, which is not
called as part of the vport delete process.
This patch rearranges the sequence in which the fcoe_if_destory() and
fcoe_interface_cleanup() functions are being called from various places
in the code. It now matches the sequence they are constructed during the
create process for both N_Port as well as NPIV port.
Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Neerav Parikh <Neerav.Parikh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index 522fbaa..204fa8d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -431,21 +431,6 @@ void fcoe_interface_cleanup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe)
struct fcoe_ctlr *fip = &fcoe->ctlr;
u8 flogi_maddr[ETH_ALEN];
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
- struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
-
- FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Destroying interface\n");
-
- /* Logout of the fabric */
- fc_fabric_logoff(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
-
- /* Cleanup the fc_lport */
- fc_lport_destroy(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
-
- /* Stop the transmit retry timer */
- del_timer_sync(&port->timer);
-
- /* Free existing transmit skbs */
- fcoe_clean_pending_queue(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
/*
* Don't listen for Ethernet packets anymore.
@@ -468,9 +453,6 @@ void fcoe_interface_cleanup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe)
} else
dev_mc_del(netdev, FIP_ALL_ENODE_MACS);
- if (!is_zero_ether_addr(port->data_src_addr))
- dev_uc_del(netdev, port->data_src_addr);
-
/* Tell the LLD we are done w/ FCoE */
ops = netdev->netdev_ops;
if (ops->ndo_fcoe_disable) {
@@ -478,6 +460,8 @@ void fcoe_interface_cleanup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe)
FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Failed to disable FCoE"
" specific feature for LLD.\n");
}
+
+ /* Release the self-reference taken during fcoe_interface_create() */
fcoe_interface_put(fcoe);
}
@@ -861,6 +845,32 @@ skip_oem:
*/
static void fcoe_if_destroy(struct fc_lport *lport)
{
+ struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(lport);
+ struct fcoe_interface *fcoe = port->priv;
+ struct net_device *netdev = fcoe->netdev;
+
+ FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Destroying interface\n");
+
+ /* Logout of the fabric */
+ fc_fabric_logoff(lport);
+
+ /* Cleanup the fc_lport */
+ fc_lport_destroy(lport);
+
+ /* Stop the transmit retry timer */
+ del_timer_sync(&port->timer);
+
+ /* Free existing transmit skbs */
+ fcoe_clean_pending_queue(lport);
+
+ rtnl_lock();
+ if (!is_zero_ether_addr(port->data_src_addr))
+ dev_uc_del(netdev, port->data_src_addr);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+
+ /* Release reference held in fcoe_if_create() */
+ fcoe_interface_put(fcoe);
+
/* Free queued packets for the per-CPU receive threads */
fcoe_percpu_clean(lport);
@@ -1813,7 +1823,6 @@ static int fcoe_device_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
list_del(&fcoe->list);
port = lport_priv(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
- fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
queue_work(fcoe_wq, &port->destroy_work);
goto out;
break;
@@ -1907,22 +1916,22 @@ static int fcoe_destroy(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct fcoe_interface *fcoe;
struct fc_lport *lport;
+ struct fcoe_port *port;
int rc = 0;
mutex_lock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
rtnl_lock();
fcoe = fcoe_hostlist_lookup_port(netdev);
if (!fcoe) {
- rtnl_unlock();
rc = -ENODEV;
goto out_nodev;
}
lport = fcoe->ctlr.lp;
+ port = lport_priv(lport);
list_del(&fcoe->list);
- fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
- rtnl_unlock();
- fcoe_if_destroy(lport);
+ queue_work(fcoe_wq, &port->destroy_work);
out_nodev:
+ rtnl_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
return rc;
}
@@ -1934,10 +1943,25 @@ out_nodev:
static void fcoe_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct fcoe_port *port;
+ struct fcoe_interface *fcoe;
+ int npiv = 0;
port = container_of(work, struct fcoe_port, destroy_work);
mutex_lock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
+
+ /* set if this is an NPIV port */
+ npiv = port->lport->vport ? 1 : 0;
+
+ fcoe = port->priv;
fcoe_if_destroy(port->lport);
+
+ /* Do not tear down the fcoe interface for NPIV port */
+ if (!npiv) {
+ rtnl_lock();
+ fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
}
@@ -1966,7 +1990,7 @@ static bool fcoe_match(struct net_device *netdev)
*/
static int fcoe_create(struct net_device *netdev, enum fip_state fip_mode)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc = 0;
struct fcoe_interface *fcoe;
struct fc_lport *lport;
@@ -1991,7 +2015,7 @@ static int fcoe_create(struct net_device *netdev, enum fip_state fip_mode)
netdev->name);
rc = -EIO;
fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
- goto out_free;
+ goto out_nodev;
}
/* Make this the "master" N_Port */
@@ -2006,17 +2030,6 @@ static int fcoe_create(struct net_device *netdev, enum fip_state fip_mode)
if (!fcoe_link_ok(lport))
fcoe_ctlr_link_up(&fcoe->ctlr);
- /*
- * Release from init in fcoe_interface_create(), on success lport
- * should be holding a reference taken in fcoe_if_create().
- */
- fcoe_interface_put(fcoe);
- rtnl_unlock();
- mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
-
- return 0;
-out_free:
- fcoe_interface_put(fcoe);
out_nodev:
rtnl_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
@@ -2298,7 +2311,6 @@ static void __exit fcoe_exit(void)
list_for_each_entry_safe(fcoe, tmp, &fcoe_hostlist, list) {
list_del(&fcoe->list);
port = lport_priv(fcoe->ctlr.lp);
- fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
queue_work(fcoe_wq, &port->destroy_work);
}
rtnl_unlock();
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-20 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-20 23:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for scsi-misc Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] tcm_fc: Fix warning in file tfc_io Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] libfc: Enhancement to RPORT state machine applicable only for VN2VN mode Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] libfc, tcm_fc: add ddp_targ() to libfc function template to supprot FCoE DDP in target mode Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] fcoe: support ndo_fcoe_ddp_target() for DDP in FCoE targe Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] fcoe: Unable to select the exchangeID from offload pool for storage targets Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] fcoe: Round-robin based selection of CPU for post-processing of incoming commands Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] fcoe: Amends previous patch, Round-robin based selection of CPU for post processing of incoming request for FCoE target Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] libfc:Fix for exchange/seq loopup failure when FCoE stack is used as target and connected to windows initaitor Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] tcm_fc: Fix ft_send_tm-bug and drop ft_get_lun_for_cmd usage Robert Love
2011-06-22 18:37 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-06-22 21:38 ` Kiran Patil
2011-06-22 23:30 ` [PATCH] " Kiran Patil
2011-06-23 2:47 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] tcm_fc: Fixing reference counting problem which was causing ft_sess to be deleted Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] libfc: post reset event on lport reset Robert Love
2011-06-20 23:59 ` Robert Love [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110620235951.1777.57649.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=Neerav.Parikh@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.b.brattain@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox