From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix various section mismatches and build errors. Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:14:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20110629151424.GD18023@kroah.com> References: <17dd5038b15d7135791aadbe80464a13c80758d3.1309182742.git.ralf@linux-mips.org> <20110627.221257.1290251511587162468.davem@davemloft.net> <20110629130711.GA15649@linux-mips.org> <1309355899.2551.4.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1309355899.2551.4.camel@mulgrave> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Ralf Baechle , David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@linux.intel.com, bcasavan@sgi.com, airlied@linux.ie, grundler@parisc-linux.org, perex@perex.cz, rpurdie@rpsys.net, klassert@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de, tj@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the > __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain. I have long felt that those __devX markings should just go away as they cause nothing but problems and have no real gain as you point out. greg k-h