From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First round of SCSI updates for 2.6.39 merge window
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:55:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110728085508.e8e00efe.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311842979.30253.29.camel@mulgrave>
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:49:39 +0400 James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 10:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:17:32 +0400 James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > This represents the usual round of driver updates (fcoe, bfa, mpt2sas,
> > > iscsi, bnx2fc) plus a couple of fixes that didn't make 3.0 including the
> > > USB force eject oops.
> > >
> > > The patch is available here:
> > >
> > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > (please fix $subject)
>
> Hmm, reusability gone too far
>
> > What has happened to these 2 patches from 2011-June-21 ?
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: fix NCR_Q720 section mismatch warning
> > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: fix sim710 section mismatch warnings
>
> Ralf is reworking them. Basically there's no point mucking with
> creating work via the endless sectional annotators in obsolete drivers,
> so he was just going to strip the annotations where they cause problems.
Thanks for the info.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-23 17:17 [GIT PULL] First round of SCSI updates for 2.6.39 merge window James Bottomley
2011-07-23 17:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-28 8:49 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 15:55 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-07-23 21:49 ` Giridhar Malavali
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-20 10:41 James Bottomley
2011-05-20 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110728085508.e8e00efe.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox