From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 3.1-rc1-git9: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <201108151943.58179.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20110815153759.GF2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110815153759.GF2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Monday, August 15, 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [NOTE: > > We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982 > > > > but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation, > > but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low > > recently. So, if you're seeing a regression from 3.0, please let us know.] > > > > This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before > > 3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > > > If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know > > either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any > > of the entries below are invalid. > > > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to > > this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the > > issue. > > > > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > > ---------------------------------------- > > 2011-08-14 63 22 19 > > > > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282 > > Subject : IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6 > > Submitter : Stephan Seitz > > Date : 2011-07-25 12:51 (21 days old) > > Message-ID : <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2 > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40172 > > Subject : lockdep trace from post 3.0. > > Submitter : Dave Jones > > Date : 2011-07-24 1:32 (22 days old) > > Message-ID : <20110724013257.GA6777@redhat.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131147120206819&w=2 > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092 > > Subject : RCU stall in linux-3.0.0 > > Submitter : Philip Armstrong > > Date : 2011-07-25 21:44 (21 days old) > > This one was due the the CPU's idea of the current time getting way > out of sync (as in more than a minute's worth of disagreement, which is > pretty impressive when you think about it). So what happened is that > one CPU decided that the current grace period was a full minute old > immediately, and thus started screaming piteously. John Stultz provided > a configuration workaround, and he and Thomas Gleixner would be working > out the long-term fix. Thanks for the update! Rafael