From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Document generic scsi device attributes Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:00:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20110817200028.GB8422@beardog.cce.hp.com> References: <20110817182055.8848.75862.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> <1313610306.6345.4.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:46519 "EHLO g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752877Ab1HQUAa (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:00:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1313610306.6345.4.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: stephenmcameron@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:45:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote: > > From: Stephen M. Cameron > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron > > --- > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..ad2d36b > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > > +What: /sys/class/scsi_device/..../device/device_blocked > > +Date: December, 2002 > > +KernelVersion: Unknown > > +Contact: James Bottomley > > Hmm, so I get fingered for every screw up in our sysfs ABI? nice wide > receiver buck pass move. Uh, sorry if that wasn't the right thing to do, which it sounds like it wasn't. I just put your name there because you're the SCSI maintainer. I can dig through all the commits and see who added what if that's preferable. Or leave the names out? or something else? -- steve