From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: ib_srpt status Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:43:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20111018164321.GA588@lst.de> References: <20111012092318.GA9405@lst.de> <1318956075.2454.10.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318956075.2454.10.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig , target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > I'm having no problems with the patch posted for v3.2 review on MT26428 > HCAs > > Can you verify you are actually using this patch, and not your private > tree from github..? The reason is that your tree did not contain the > bugfix below to ib_srpt code that was originally causing problems: > > ib_srpt: Fix bug with chainged SGLs in srpt_map_sg_to_ib_sge > http://www.risingtidesystems.com/git/?p=lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea485147563b6555a97dbf811825fbb586519252 Also it would be useful to know the workload that causes the corruption.