From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:59:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECB37E4.6020204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:19:24 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Subject : khugepaged blocks suspend2ram (3.2.0-rc1-00252-g8f042aa)
> > Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2011-11-12 10:48
> > Message-ID : 20111112104859.7744b282@sf.home
> > References : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/11
> >
>
> Andrea's patch already fixes this issue, which was reported first by
> Jiri Slaby. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/93
> I remember Andrew Morton taking this patch in his -mm tree. But it is
> not in mainline yet. So can we consider this closed or not?
grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a
regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend.
I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-28 18:22 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 3.0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-28 19:35 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <20110828193519.GA14132-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-28 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-28 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-21 21:49 ` 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-21 22:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CALCETrUpXrsjBLZsZU3u+y7KCDO0LW55QoBQkBqN_BPFZHsrkw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-22 7:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-21 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-21 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CA+55aFygSFt+O5KLoiE_0V+o45eKfsoDDV5ML8EF=J0n9z_D-Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-28 8:33 ` [PATCH] hugetlb: release pages in the error path of hugetlb_cow() (was: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1) Michal Hocko
2011-11-21 22:20 ` 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 Linus Torvalds
2011-11-22 5:27 ` Ari Savolainen
2011-11-21 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CA+55aFyy19VYSdZW0+jNxAb8ix0xpX2j9YFw9oQi3jm3+mDEvw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-23 7:37 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <201111212249.31196.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-21 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-21 22:29 ` Alex Deucher
2011-11-22 5:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-22 5:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-11-22 12:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-22 13:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-29 18:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-29 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-11-29 20:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <20111130175936.GA15168-6K5HmflnPlqSPmnEAIUT9EEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-01 11:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-01 14:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-20 23:11 ` 3.2-rc6+: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-20 23:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201112210039.14100.linux-pm-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-21 6:45 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).