From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@gmail.com>
Cc: JBottomley@Parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI/sd: Fix NULL dereference in sd_revalidate_disk
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:51:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111126105146.756a122a@stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+v9cxbk0p_FTDq7TMEc5draOMz4n46H4t=iLe2brkosM=LHVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 24 Huajun Li wrote:
> While unplugging usb disk, scsi_disk(disk)->device may be released
> before sd_revalidate_disk() is called, then there will occur Oops as
> shown below:
[...]
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2354,10 +2354,15 @@ static int sd_try_extended_inquiry(struct
> scsi_device *sdp)
> static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> {
> struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
> - struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> + struct scsi_device *sdp;
> unsigned char *buffer;
> unsigned flush = 0;
>
> + if (sdkp)
> + sdp = sdkp->device;
> + else
> + goto out;
> +
> SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(3, sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp,
> "sd_revalidate_disk\n"));
>
Shouldn't rather the [block -- command-set-driver -- scsi-core -- lld]
stack be structured along the lines that lower-level device instances live
as long as higher levels rely on them?
For about a year now or so, I am seeing patches floating by that add NULL
pointer checks here and there (or patches that clear pointers), and every
time I wonder
- where else such NULL pointer checks might be needed,
- in what way (if at all) it is ensured that a function which is made to
check for a valid pointer at the top does not race with pointer
invalidation further down the road.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-== =-== ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-26 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-24 14:30 [PATCH] SCSI/sd: Fix NULL dereference in sd_revalidate_disk Huajun Li
2011-11-26 9:51 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2011-11-26 14:00 ` James Bottomley
2011-11-27 1:28 ` Huajun Li
2011-11-27 2:20 ` Huajun Li
2011-11-27 2:38 ` James Bottomley
2011-11-27 3:22 ` Huajun Li
2011-11-30 14:43 ` Huajun Li
2011-11-30 14:50 ` Huajun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111126105146.756a122a@stein \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=JBottomley@Parallels.com \
--cc=huajun.li.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox