From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Eric Seppanen <eric@purestorage.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@parallels.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue())
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:26:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130102643.GA2033@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED60302.7000304@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I agree on a+b, but c is definitely more than debatable. I have yet to
> see a device saturate its bandwidth on 4KB IOS. So merging on the write
> side is always going to be a win.
We shouldn't submit 4k I/O in the first place unless they truely are
random. If you look at XFS for example you'd basically never see them.
The only small I/O in a typical workloads are individual btree blocks
and AG header updates, which generally can't be merged anyway. Data I/O
happens in larger chunks generally, as do reads/writes of inodes
(generally in 32k chunks, with plans to go larger).
Note that the merges in the way the are done currently are one of the
most painful bits of the current request_fn based drivers. They require
the addition of the struct request data structure, which needs to be
allocated and initialized for every bio, no matter if it's beeing merged
or not, and are the prime reason why make_request_fn and request_fn
style drivers can't operate on the same data structures.
I've been wondering if it would be possible to simply chain bios for
merging, and while it's theoretically possible I'm wondering about
the impact on drivers. Fortunately scsi drivers generally don't touch
struct request directly, so it might be doable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 13:18 [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue() Hannes Reinecke
2011-09-28 0:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 0:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28 2:02 ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 4:10 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 14:11 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:14 ` [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue()) Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 17:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 19:05 ` Eric Seppanen
2011-09-28 19:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 10:18 ` Jens Axboe
2011-11-30 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-09-28 22:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:59 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-13 13:09 ` Steffen Maier
2011-10-14 16:03 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-17 8:46 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-17 14:06 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-18 13:31 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-18 15:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-18 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 10:05 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 10:42 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 11:46 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-31 13:00 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-02 12:37 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-02 12:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-02 13:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04 4:07 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-04 9:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-03 18:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04 9:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04 13:30 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04 13:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-07 11:31 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 13:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 12:23 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 11:30 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 15:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 16:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 17:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 21:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-09 9:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-10 16:10 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-17 16:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-29 12:00 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-29 20:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-30 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-12-12 12:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-12-13 16:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 14:01 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111130102643.GA2033@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=eric@purestorage.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).