public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: "cyril.galibern" <cyril.galibern@opensvc.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Write protected devices, unexpected dm-multipath queueing
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:55:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120106225554.GA15329@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120106223212.GB2393@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 06 2012 at  5:32pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 06 2012 at  2:30pm -0500,
> Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hannes, list,
> > 
> > reading your kernel path there
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=63583cca745f440167bf27877182dc13e19d4bcf
> > I wonder if this is expected that a write io on a write protected device
> > is returned to the queue ? I would have guessed it qualified as
> > TARGET_ERROR, hence not retryable (and not causing path invalidation).
> > 
> > In the following log the sense code is clearly seen as 
> > Sense Key : Data Protect [current]
> > Add. Sense: Write protected
> > 
> > The log is grabbed from a el6 kernel rev. 131 which include the
> > mentioned patch (since rev. 110 iirc).
> > 
> > Care to confirm something is fishy there ?
> 
> scsi_check_sense() needs to be trained to return TARGET_ERROR for this
> case.
> 
> The commit you referenced wasn't meant to have covered _every_ possible
> TARGET_ERROR case.

Hmm, but looking closer that commit _does_ return TARGET_ERROR for
DATA_PROTECT.

I need to dig deeper, but I think Hannes gets back to work on Monday.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-06 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1325878251.19595.13.camel@lapoo.opensvc.com>
2012-01-06 22:32 ` Write protected devices, unexpected dm-multipath queueing Mike Snitzer
2012-01-06 22:55   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2012-01-06 23:20     ` Mike Snitzer
2012-01-07  9:39       ` Christophe Varoqui
2012-01-09  8:01   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120106225554.GA15329@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
    --cc=cyril.galibern@opensvc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox