From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FireWire/SBP2 Target mode
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:17:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207201730.1c8cf6a3@stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F30D4F6.1040802@bootc.net>
On Feb 07 Chris Boot wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 23:09, Chris Boot wrote:
> > On 6 Feb 2012, at 23:00, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 09:28, Chris Boot<bootc@bootc.net> wrote:
> >>> Waiting until the bus scan is complete isn't actually that great
> >>> as I see the first LOGIN requests often before the fw_node is seen
> >>> at all. I'd have to turn away the requester and hope they try again.
An SBP-2 initiator should be prepared to retry its first login attempt if
it sent it shortly after a bus reset. The target may still hold
reservations for previously loggend in initiators for up to reconnect_hold
+ 2 seconds after bus reset.
> >>> I'm fairly sure my little tweak in my patch is a simple enough
> >>> solution.
Yep.
> >> Stupid question: Could you use a completion queue or something
> >> equivalent to wait until you have seen the fw_node, *then* process the
> >> LOGIN request?
> >
> > The fw_address_handler callback is called in interrupt context, and
> > I can't sleep from within there. As far as I'm aware I must call
> > fw_send_response() from within the callback and can't defer that until
> > I've scheduled something on a work queue. Please correct me if I'm
> > wrong though, as that might be useful anyway.
>
> Hmm sorry I've thought about this overnight and clearly I was talking
> rubbish. Yes, I need to reply in the fw_address_handler but all I tend
> to do in there is schedule a task to the the main part of the work
> anyway. As most of the operations require fetching an ORB from the
> initiator I have to do this from user context.
Technically there are two things to perform:
1. Finish the inbound IEEE 1394 transaction to the management agent
register by means of fw_send_response(). As far as I can tell, you
don't have to do that in the address_callback(). But there is little
reason not to.
fw_send_response() ends the lifetime of an fw_request, so read the
speed code before you respond.
2. Finish the inbound SBP-2 transaction; here the login. This and
everything that leads up to it is definitely easiest to implement in
a process context, e.g. workqueue item.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-- --=- --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 14:51 FireWire/SBP2 Target mode Chris Boot
2011-08-17 18:57 ` Stefan Richter
2011-08-18 16:19 ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-01 19:50 ` Andy Grover
2012-02-01 21:41 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-02 9:22 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-02-02 10:09 ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-06 13:13 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-06 14:43 ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-06 14:51 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-06 20:26 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-06 22:28 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-06 23:00 ` Julian Calaby
2012-02-06 23:09 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-07 7:38 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-07 10:06 ` Julian Calaby
2012-02-07 19:17 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2012-02-07 19:53 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207201730.1c8cf6a3@stein \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).