From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] iscsi_tcp: bound max_r2t in iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_param() Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:04:00 -0800 Message-ID: <20120209160400.GA27492@kroah.com> References: <1325368867-13696-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <4F015753.1010106@cs.wisc.edu> <2EB25344-4C9E-4D3C-8406-5A4D015CB364@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:40753 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753539Ab2BIQUC (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:20:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2EB25344-4C9E-4D3C-8406-5A4D015CB364@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Xi Wang , Mike Christie Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:18:07AM -0500, Xi Wang wrote: > On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Mike Christie wrote: > > Are you actually hitting this and if so with what tools and target? And > > when using greater than 1 do you see any throughput improvements? > > No, I was worrying about security. > > > What about the attached patch? It also fixes cxgb*i. > > <0001-libiscsi_tcp-fix-max_r2t-manipulation.patch> > > Looks good to me. Thanks! What ever happened to this patch, is it in Linus's tree yet? thanks, greg k-h