From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] fcoe: Do not switch context in vport_delete callback
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:18:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120211011841.7668.27533.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120211011754.7668.51489.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
Currently all port deletion is routed though the FCoE
workqueue (fcoe_wq). When fc_remove_host is called on
an N_Port (for example, from fcoe_destroy) the vports
are queued into a FC Transport workqueue. fc_remove_host
flushes that queue and each vport is passed to fcoe's
fcoe_vport_destroy, which simply queues the associated
fcoe_ports for later deletion. This queue cannot be
flushed within the N_Ports destroy path because of
circular locking issues. The result is that the NPIV
ports are destroyed after the N_Port, which is reverse
of how they are created.
This quirk causes fcoe to keep references on the
fcoe_interface shared by each of these ports (N_Port
and NPIV). Changing the ordering such that NPIV ports
are destroyed before the N_Port will allow us to remove
reference counting on the fcoe_interface instances.
This patch simply allows fcoe_vport_destory to destroy
NPIV ports without deferring them to a workqueue context.
This ensures that when fc_remove_host is called the
NPIV ports will be destroyed first before the N_Port and
allows reference counting on the fcoe's fcoe_interface
to be remove in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index 449df17..f5286c4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -2099,20 +2099,14 @@ static void fcoe_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct fcoe_port *port;
struct fcoe_interface *fcoe;
- int npiv = 0;
port = container_of(work, struct fcoe_port, destroy_work);
mutex_lock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
- /* set if this is an NPIV port */
- npiv = port->lport->vport ? 1 : 0;
-
fcoe = port->priv;
fcoe_if_destroy(port->lport);
- /* Do not tear down the fcoe interface for NPIV port */
- if (!npiv)
- fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
+ fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe);
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
}
@@ -2683,12 +2677,15 @@ static int fcoe_vport_destroy(struct fc_vport *vport)
struct Scsi_Host *shost = vport_to_shost(vport);
struct fc_lport *n_port = shost_priv(shost);
struct fc_lport *vn_port = vport->dd_data;
- struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(vn_port);
mutex_lock(&n_port->lp_mutex);
list_del(&vn_port->list);
mutex_unlock(&n_port->lp_mutex);
- queue_work(fcoe_wq, &port->destroy_work);
+
+ mutex_lock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
+ fcoe_if_destroy(vn_port);
+ mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-11 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-11 1:17 [PATCH 00/12] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for scsi-misc Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:17 ` [PATCH 01/12] libfcoe: Don't KERN_ERR on netdev notification Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 02/12] scsi_transport_fc: Add FDMI host attributes Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 03/12] scsi_transport_fc: Getting FC Port Speed in sync with FC-GS Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 04/12] libfc: Make the libfc Common Transport(CT) code generic Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 05/12] libfc: Add support for FDMI Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 06/12] fcoe: Add support for FDMI in fcoe Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 07/12] fcoe: Allow exposing FDMI attributes via sysfs Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 08/12] fcoe: Rename out_nomod label to out_putmod Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` Robert Love [this message]
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 10/12] fcoe: Remove reference counting on 'stuct fcoe_interface' Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 11/12] libfc: Fix panic in fc_exch_recv Robert Love
2012-02-11 1:18 ` [PATCH 12/12] libfc: Handle discovery failure during ctlr link down Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120211011841.7668.27533.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.b.brattain@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox