From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Poetzl Subject: Re: 3.2.x Regression for SAS Controller on Dell C6100 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20120224033742.GP29141@MAIL.13thfloor.at> References: <20120131180949.GT29272@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20120224003559.41dea166@schatten> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120224003559.41dea166@schatten> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Mickler Cc: Linux Kernel ML , JBottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:35:59AM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > [adding some cc's from that area ] > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:09:49 +0100 > Herbert Poetzl wrote: >> Greetings! >> I'm seeing a regression on a Dell C6100 machine with >> 3.2.x kernels, where the second disk (in a raid setup) >> is not properly recogniced and so the raid drops into >> degraded mode Just retested with 3.2.7 and 3.3-rc4 and it seems that this regression got fixed somewhere between 3.2.2 and 3.2.7 ... if there is interest, I can narrow it down to a specific version change, just drop me a message ... will do some more testing in the meantime. HTH, Herbert >> the same hardware works fine with 3.1.x kernels and >> older >> attached the dmesg output of the bootup for a working >> and a failing kernel >> thanks in advance, >> Herbert