From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [Topic] Bcache
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:47:53 -0400
Message-ID: <20120314184753.GA9358@infradead.org>
References: <20120314133228.GA2284@dhcp-172-18-216-138.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <20120314155339.GC30235@redhat.com>
 <CAAsGZS6Jw8xCdu3Wuve=iaKpd_UNdm72kbTbiQtypAfrZ46PWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+dOx+Vgv12w=Q=8hCQggLg+kq6TnT2i3ZtnpZ=bNVyMgk31Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAsGZS5UTrYTbncAjk1Vor6R_-KWDboTw3sh+jXCbXm5q_o-TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+dOx+M5so=YOx=O2vUjpdHsG+oiGsJh3GouoVq+twL+tO3Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:57533
	"EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760630Ab2CNSr6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:47:58 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH+dOx+M5so=YOx=O2vUjpdHsG+oiGsJh3GouoVq+twL+tO3Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: chetan loke <loke.chetan@gmail.com>, nauman@google.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:41:35PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> If you want me to implement bcache differently, shouldn't you explain
> why? I'm not sure why I _have_ to justify my decisions to you.

You don't have to - unless you want to get bcache merged into the
mainline kernel.  If you don't want to you probably shouldn't bother
appearing at the LSF, though.