From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set the scsi result correctly when SRB status is INVALID Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:36:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20120316203642.GA14802@kroah.com> References: <1331929448-6838-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1331929472-6877-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1331929472-6877-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, ohering@suse.com, jbottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:24:31PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > Currently Windows hosts only support a subset of scsi commands and for commands > that are not supported, the host returns a generic SRB failure status. > However, they have agreed to change the return value to indicate that > the command is not supported. In preparation for that, handle the > SRB_STATUS_INVALID_REQUEST return value correctly. > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang > --- > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 8 ++++++++ I need an ack from the scsi maintainer before I can accept this patch. James?