From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, hare@suse.de,
babu.moger@netapp.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:10:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120510141057.GA1983@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120510065548.GA5728@infradead.org>
On Thu, May 10 2012 at 2:55am -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:12:46PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Originally posted to dm-devel but Chandra reminded me to post to
> > linux-scsi for James to pick it up.
> >
> > -------8<-------
> >
> > Introduce scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() to retrieve the name of the
> > scsi_dh that is attached to the scsi_device associated with the provided
> > request queue. Returns NULL if a scsi_dh is not attached.
> >
> > Also, fix scsi_dh_{attach,detach} function header comments to document
> > @q rather than @sdev.
>
> Wha'ts the use case for this?
See this patch:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2012-May/msg00046.html
(I attributed this change to Hannes because it was based on his earlier
patch... I should probably change that given that in the end I
re-wrote/merged his patch with my earlier patch...)
Anyway, DM mpath doesn't want to know about the "scsi_dh" structure, but
we need the name of the attached handler (to adjust the multipath
device's 'hw_handler_name' and to get an additional ref on the attached
scsi_dh via dm-mapth.c:parse_path's scsi_dh_attach).
BTW, only reason I split the scsi_dh change from the above dm-mpath
patch is because I'm patching SCSI and DM and need to send the changes
through different trees.
> The name is stale as soon as the function returns.
Yeah, I have since wondered about that myself. In practice the attached
handler should remain attached so the name really won't be stale.
But in theory there could be a race with scsi_dh_detach. So I think the
following should address your concern?
If so I'll refresh and repost the appropriate patches.
Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index 1039e7f..6f11956 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -592,10 +592,11 @@ static struct pgpath *parse_path(struct dm_arg_set *as, struct path_selector *ps
q = bdev_get_queue(p->path.dev->bdev);
if (m->use_default_hw_handler) {
- const char *attached_handler_name = scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(q);
+ const char *attached_handler_name =
+ scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(q, GFP_KERNEL);
if (attached_handler_name) {
kfree(m->hw_handler_name);
- m->hw_handler_name = kstrdup(attached_handler_name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ m->hw_handler_name = attached_handler_name;
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
index 83071e4..33e422e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
@@ -533,10 +533,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_dh_detach);
* scsi_dh_attached_handler_name - Get attached device handler's name
* @q - Request queue that is associated with the scsi_device
* that may have a device handler attached
+ * @gfp - the GFP mask used in the kmalloc() call when allocating memory
*
* Returns name of attached handler, NULL if no handler is attached.
+ * Caller must take care to free the returned string.
*/
-const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q)
+const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct scsi_device *sdev;
@@ -552,7 +554,7 @@ const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q)
return NULL;
if (sdev->scsi_dh_data)
- handler_name = sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh->name;
+ handler_name = kstrdup(sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh->name, gfp);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
return handler_name;
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h b/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
index 94f502b..620c723 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ extern int scsi_dh_activate(struct request_queue *, activate_complete, void *);
extern int scsi_dh_handler_exist(const char *);
extern int scsi_dh_attach(struct request_queue *, const char *);
extern void scsi_dh_detach(struct request_queue *);
-extern const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q);
+extern const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *, gfp_t);
extern int scsi_dh_set_params(struct request_queue *, const char *);
#else
static inline int scsi_dh_activate(struct request_queue *req,
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline void scsi_dh_detach(struct request_queue *q)
{
return;
}
-static inline const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q)
+static inline const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q,
+ gfp_t gfp)
{
return NULL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 1:12 [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name Mike Snitzer
2012-05-10 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-05-10 14:10 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2012-05-10 18:14 ` Moger, Babu
2012-05-10 20:26 ` Moger, Babu
2012-05-10 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2012-05-17 21:12 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2012-05-17 21:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-05-17 22:57 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2012-05-17 22:58 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2012-05-21 18:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-06-08 15:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] <1336514167-15393-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1336514167-15393-3-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <77471C95FAFD844C8CA02DD4F4C5FE2B05D284@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
2012-05-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <20120509204101.GB26785@redhat.com>
2012-05-09 22:54 ` Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120510141057.GA1983@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@netapp.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).