* [Bug 12119] iscsi repeatedly times out
2008-11-29 11:10 [Bug 12119] New: " bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-29 17:40 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 1:39 ` bugme-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-29 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
akpm@osdl.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 12119] iscsi repeatedly times out
2008-11-29 11:10 [Bug 12119] New: " bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 17:40 ` [Bug 12119] " bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-01 1:39 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 4:11 ` bugme-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-01 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
------- Comment #1 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-30 17:39 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> Hardware Environment:diskless i386, swap on iscsi device
> Software Environment:open-iscsi v 6.2
What is the rest of this version string? With fedora run
rpm -q iscsi-initiator-utils
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 12119] iscsi repeatedly times out
2008-11-29 11:10 [Bug 12119] New: " bugme-daemon
2008-11-29 17:40 ` [Bug 12119] " bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 1:39 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-01 4:11 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 13:39 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 16:20 ` bugme-daemon
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-01 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
------- Comment #2 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-30 20:11 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
Mike Christie wrote:
> bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>> Hardware Environment:diskless i386, swap on iscsi device
>> Software Environment:open-iscsi v 6.2
>
> What is the rest of this version string? With fedora run
>
> rpm -q iscsi-initiator-utils
Ignore that request.
Try the attached patch made over 2.6.27 which was the base for the
kernel I thought you were using. This should also work with 2.6.28-rc*.
Oh yeah for 2.6.27 are you using a fedora kernel? If you are building
your own kernel and you are using F8 then make sure you compile the
kernel with
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y
because a lot of tools in F8 may not work right without it. The older
iscsi tools in there will not and you will run into lots of other
problems, because there were some sysfs changes which affected iscsi and
we were not ready for them back then. Newer tools in F9 and F10 and
open-iscsi.org will handle any sysfs layout so if you can you might want
to grab the iscsi-initiator-utils rpm from the F9 repository.
--- linux-2.6.27-rc5.work/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c 2008-08-28
17:52:02.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc5/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c 2008-11-30 21:46:55.000000000
-0600
@@ -494,12 +494,6 @@ __iscsi_conn_send_pdu(struct iscsi_conn
if (!__kfifo_get(session->cmdpool.queue,
(void*)&task, sizeof(void*)))
return NULL;
-
- if ((hdr->opcode == (ISCSI_OP_NOOP_OUT | ISCSI_OP_IMMEDIATE))
&&
- hdr->ttt == RESERVED_ITT) {
- conn->ping_task = task;
- conn->last_ping = jiffies;
- }
}
/*
* released in complete pdu for task we expect a response for, and
@@ -674,6 +668,11 @@ static void iscsi_send_nopout(struct isc
task = __iscsi_conn_send_pdu(conn, (struct iscsi_hdr *)&hdr, NULL, 0);
if (!task)
iscsi_conn_printk(KERN_ERR, conn, "Could not send nopout\n");
+ else if (!rhdr) {
+ /* only track our nops */
+ conn->ping_task = task;
+ conn->last_ping = jiffies;
+ }
}
static int iscsi_handle_reject(struct iscsi_conn *conn, struct iscsi_hdr *hdr,
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 12119] iscsi repeatedly times out
2008-11-29 11:10 [Bug 12119] New: " bugme-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-01 4:11 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-01 13:39 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-01 16:19 ` Mike Christie
2008-12-01 16:20 ` bugme-daemon
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-01 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
------- Comment #3 from ian@beware.dropbear.id.au 2008-12-01 05:39 -------
Thanks. The patch wouldn't apply but I applied it by hand. It works fine.
I didn't know about the CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECIATED options. Unfortunately I can't
upgrade to FC9 or FC10 because of a kernel nfs bug(s) [11061,11154]. I'm not
sure if I could run FC10 with an older kernel, but things like the changes to
sysfs shows it is best not to assume so!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 12119] iscsi repeatedly times out
2008-11-29 11:10 [Bug 12119] New: " bugme-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-01 13:39 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-01 16:20 ` bugme-daemon
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-01 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
------- Comment #4 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-12-01 08:20 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12119
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #3 from ian@beware.dropbear.id.au 2008-12-01 05:39 -------
> Thanks. The patch wouldn't apply but I applied it by hand. It works fine.
Ok. I will submit a patch. Thanks for the report and testing.
>
> I didn't know about the CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECIATED options. Unfortunately I can't
> upgrade to FC9 or FC10 because of a kernel nfs bug(s) [11061,11154]. I'm not
> sure if I could run FC10 with an older kernel, but things like the changes to
> sysfs shows it is best not to assume so!
>
I did not mean to upgrade to all F10 or F9 - just the iscsi package in
there. The code across them is the same more or less. F9 and F8 were the
same for iscsi, so if you use:
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/9/x86_64.newkey/iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.870-1.0.fc9.x86_64.rpm
(for i386 or ppc then swap the x86_64 refs for your arch) on F8 then you
should be ok.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread