From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
mroos@linux.ee, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: cleanup usages of scsi_complete_async_scans
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 23:37:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205302337.13178.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205302334.12247.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Now that scsi registers its async scan work with the async subsystem,
> > wait_for_device_probe() is sufficient for ensuring all scanning is
> > complete.
> >
> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 12 ------------
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c | 15 +++++----------
> > include/scsi/scsi_scan.h | 11 -----------
> > kernel/power/hibernate.c | 8 --------
> > kernel/power/user.c | 2 --
> > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 include/scsi/scsi_scan.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > index fb42aa0..20c7108 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > @@ -184,18 +184,6 @@ int scsi_complete_async_scans(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Only exported for the benefit of scsi_wait_scan */
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> > -
> > -#ifndef MODULE
> > -/*
> > - * For async scanning we need to wait for all the scans to complete before
> > - * trying to mount the root fs. Otherwise non-modular drivers may not be ready
> > - * yet.
> > - */
> > -late_initcall(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> > -#endif
> > -
> > /**
> > * scsi_unlock_floptical - unlock device via a special MODE SENSE command
> > * @sdev: scsi device to send command to
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c
> > index 74708fc..57de24a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c
> > @@ -12,21 +12,16 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > -#include <scsi/scsi_scan.h>
> >
> > static int __init wait_scan_init(void)
> > {
> > /*
> > - * First we need to wait for device probing to finish;
> > - * the drivers we just loaded might just still be probing
> > - * and might not yet have reached the scsi async scanning
> > + * This will not return until all async work (system wide) is
> > + * quiesced. Probing queues host-scanning work to the async
> > + * queue which is why we don't need a separate call to
> > + * scsi_complete_async_scans()
> > */
> > wait_for_device_probe();
> > - /*
> > - * and then we wait for the actual asynchronous scsi scan
> > - * to finish.
> > - */
> > - scsi_complete_async_scans();
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -38,5 +33,5 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SCSI wait for scans");
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("James Bottomley");
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
> > -late_initcall(wait_scan_init);
> > +module_init(wait_scan_init);
> > module_exit(wait_scan_exit);
> > diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_scan.h b/include/scsi/scsi_scan.h
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 7889888..0000000
> > --- a/include/scsi/scsi_scan.h
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
> > -#ifndef _SCSI_SCSI_SCAN_H
> > -#define _SCSI_SCSI_SCAN_H
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI
> > -/* drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c */
> > -extern int scsi_complete_async_scans(void);
> > -#else
> > -static inline int scsi_complete_async_scans(void) { return 0; }
> > -#endif
> > -
> > -#endif /* _SCSI_SCSI_SCAN_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > index e09dfbf..821114a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
> > #include <linux/freezer.h>
> > #include <linux/gfp.h>
> > #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> > -#include <scsi/scsi_scan.h>
> >
> > #include "power.h"
> >
> > @@ -735,13 +734,6 @@ static int software_resume(void)
> > async_synchronize_full();
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * We can't depend on SCSI devices being available after loading
> > - * one of their modules until scsi_complete_async_scans() is
> > - * called and the resume device usually is a SCSI one.
> > - */
> > - scsi_complete_async_scans();
> > -
>
> I believe this is wrong. You're going to introduce a regression on systems
> using built-in hibernation and built-in SCSI stack.
>
> > swsusp_resume_device = name_to_dev_t(resume_file);
> > if (!swsusp_resume_device) {
> > error = -ENODEV;
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c
> > index 91b0fd0..4ed81e7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/user.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/user.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> > #include <linux/console.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/freezer.h>
> > -#include <scsi/scsi_scan.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >
> > @@ -84,7 +83,6 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > * appear.
> > */
> > wait_for_device_probe();
> > - scsi_complete_async_scans();
>
> Same here.
Well, not exactly. Built-in SCSI with userspace-based hibernation.
> >
> > data->swap = -1;
> > data->mode = O_WRONLY;
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 18:21 [PATCH v2 0/4] fix / cleanup async scsi scanning Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] async: introduce 'async_domain' type Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] async: make async_synchronize_full() flush all work regardless of domain Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: queue async scan work to an async_schedule domain Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: cleanup usages of scsi_complete_async_scans Dan Williams
2012-05-30 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-05-30 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:49 ` Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] fix / cleanup async scsi scanning Borislav Petkov
2012-05-30 18:29 ` Dan Williams
2012-05-30 22:33 ` walt
2012-05-31 13:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 9:05 ` mroos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205302337.13178.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).