linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:46:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615084644.GA3479@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDAEED4.20601@redhat.com>

On Fri 15-06-12 10:14:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/05/2012 12:10, Jan Kara ha scritto:
> > Sometimes, warnings about ioctls to partition happen often enough that they
> > form majority of the warnings in the kernel log and users complain. In some
> > cases warnings are about ioctls such as SG_IO so it's not good to get rid of
> > the warnings completely as they can ease debugging of userspace problems
> > when ioctl is refused.
> > 
> > Since I have seen warnings from lots of commands, including some proprietary
> > userspace applications, I don't think disallowing the ioctls for processes
> > with CAP_SYS_RAWIO will happen in the near future if ever. So lets just
> > stop warning for processes with CAP_SYS_RAWIO for which ioctl is allowed.
> > 
> > CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > CC: James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>
> > CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > ---
> >  block/scsi_ioctl.c |    5 ++++-
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> > index 260fa80..9a87daa 100644
> > --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> > @@ -721,11 +721,14 @@ int scsi_verify_blk_ioctl(struct block_device *bd, unsigned int cmd)
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >  	/* In particular, rule out all resets and host-specific ioctls.  */
> >  	printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> >  			   "%s: sending ioctl %x to a partition!\n", current->comm, cmd);
> >  
> > -	return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> > +	return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_verify_blk_ioctl);
> >  
> > 
> 
> Ping?
  Good that you bring this up :). I've asked the customer about whether
they can find out the particular SG_IO ioctl Veritas issues but never heard
back. So will we merge my patch? I remember you gave it reluctant ack once
;).

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-02 10:10 [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition Jan Kara
2012-05-02 10:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 10:37   ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-02 10:54   ` Alan Cox
2012-05-02 11:02     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 11:12       ` Alan Cox
2012-05-02 11:24         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 12:05           ` Alan Cox
2012-05-02 12:23             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 19:38           ` Mark Lord
2012-05-03  7:47             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-03 12:40               ` Mark Lord
2012-05-03 12:47                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-03 17:36                   ` Mark Lord
2012-05-04  6:39                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-04 13:06                       ` Mark Lord
2012-05-04 13:08                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-04 13:11                         ` Mark Lord
2012-05-04 13:24                           ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 13:51   ` Jan Kara
2012-05-02 13:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 15:10       ` Alan Cox
2012-05-02 15:49         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 20:49           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-05-02 19:49       ` Jan Kara
2012-05-02 21:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-15  8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-15  8:46   ` Jan Kara [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-15 10:50 Jan Kara
2012-06-15 10:51 ` Jens Axboe
2012-06-15 13:58   ` Nick Bowler
2012-06-15 14:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-15 14:23     ` Jan Kara
2012-06-15 14:31       ` Nick Bowler
2012-06-15 11:00 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120615084644.GA3479@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).