From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: do not set changed flag on all unit attention conditions Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:36:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20120717163612.GA15995@infradead.org> References: <1342454772-9018-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1342455503.3176.42.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <50044D56.6000400@redhat.com> <1342511100.3039.9.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <50052390.7030908@redhat.com> <1342514444.3039.23.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <5005285E.8060706@redhat.com> <1342516317.3039.35.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:52059 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754627Ab2GQQgQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:36:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1342516317.3039.35.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:11:57AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote: > There's no such thing in the market today as a removable disk that's > resizeable. Removable disks are for things like backup cartridges and > ageing jazz drives. Worse: most removeable devices today are USB card > readers whose standards compliance varies from iffy to non existent. > Resizeable disks are currently the province of storage arrays. The virtual disks exported by aacraid are both marked removable and can be resized.