From: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] zfcp: restore refcount check on port_remove
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:23:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120904132348.845821668@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120904132328.564402930@linux.vnet.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: 713-zfcp-restore-port-refcount-check.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5574 bytes --]
From: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Upstream commit f3450c7b917201bb49d67032e9f60d5125675d6a
"[SCSI] zfcp: Replace local reference counting with common kref"
accidentally dropped a reference count check before tearing down
zfcp_ports that are potentially in use by zfcp_units.
Even remote ports in use can be removed causing
unreachable garbage objects zfcp_ports with zfcp_units.
Thus units won't come back even after a manual port_rescan.
The kref of zfcp_port->dev.kobj is already used by the driver core.
We cannot re-use it to track the number of zfcp_units.
Re-introduce our own counter for units per port
and check on port_remove.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #2.6.33+
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
@@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ struct zfcp_port *zfcp_port_enqueue(stru
rwlock_init(&port->unit_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->unit_list);
+ atomic_set(&port->units, 0);
INIT_WORK(&port->gid_pn_work, zfcp_fc_port_did_lookup);
INIT_WORK(&port->test_link_work, zfcp_fc_link_test_work);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ struct zfcp_port {
struct zfcp_adapter *adapter; /* adapter used to access port */
struct list_head unit_list; /* head of logical unit list */
rwlock_t unit_list_lock; /* unit list lock */
+ atomic_t units; /* zfcp_unit count */
atomic_t status; /* status of this remote port */
u64 wwnn; /* WWNN if known */
u64 wwpn; /* WWPN */
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ extern void zfcp_scsi_dif_sense_error(st
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_unit_attrs;
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_adapter_attrs;
extern struct attribute_group zfcp_sysfs_port_attrs;
+extern struct mutex zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex;
extern struct device_attribute *zfcp_sysfs_sdev_attrs[];
extern struct device_attribute *zfcp_sysfs_shost_attrs[];
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
@@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_rescan_st
static ZFCP_DEV_ATTR(adapter, port_rescan, S_IWUSR, NULL,
zfcp_sysfs_port_rescan_store);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+
static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
@@ -249,6 +251,16 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_st
else
retval = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ if (atomic_read(&port->units) > 0) {
+ retval = -EBUSY;
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ /* port is about to be removed, so no more unit_add */
+ atomic_set(&port->units, -1);
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+
write_lock_irq(&adapter->port_list_lock);
list_del(&port->list);
write_unlock_irq(&adapter->port_list_lock);
@@ -289,12 +301,14 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_unit_add_store
{
struct zfcp_port *port = container_of(dev, struct zfcp_port, dev);
u64 fcp_lun;
+ int retval;
if (strict_strtoull(buf, 0, (unsigned long long *) &fcp_lun))
return -EINVAL;
- if (zfcp_unit_add(port, fcp_lun))
- return -EINVAL;
+ retval = zfcp_unit_add(port, fcp_lun);
+ if (retval)
+ return retval;
return count;
}
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void zfcp_unit_release(struct dev
{
struct zfcp_unit *unit = container_of(dev, struct zfcp_unit, dev);
- put_device(&unit->port->dev);
+ atomic_dec(&unit->port->units);
kfree(unit);
}
@@ -119,16 +119,27 @@ static void zfcp_unit_release(struct dev
int zfcp_unit_add(struct zfcp_port *port, u64 fcp_lun)
{
struct zfcp_unit *unit;
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ if (atomic_read(&port->units) == -1) {
+ /* port is already gone */
+ retval = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
unit = zfcp_unit_find(port, fcp_lun);
if (unit) {
put_device(&unit->dev);
- return -EEXIST;
+ retval = -EEXIST;
+ goto out;
}
unit = kzalloc(sizeof(struct zfcp_unit), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!unit)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!unit) {
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
unit->port = port;
unit->fcp_lun = fcp_lun;
@@ -139,28 +150,33 @@ int zfcp_unit_add(struct zfcp_port *port
if (dev_set_name(&unit->dev, "0x%016llx",
(unsigned long long) fcp_lun)) {
kfree(unit);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
- get_device(&port->dev);
-
if (device_register(&unit->dev)) {
put_device(&unit->dev);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
if (sysfs_create_group(&unit->dev.kobj, &zfcp_sysfs_unit_attrs)) {
device_unregister(&unit->dev);
- return -EINVAL;
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
+ atomic_inc(&port->units); /* under zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex ! */
+
write_lock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&unit->list, &port->unit_list);
write_unlock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
zfcp_unit_scsi_scan(unit);
- return 0;
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex);
+ return retval;
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-04 13:23 [PATCH 0/8] zfcp: patches for 3.6-rc Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] zfcp: Adapt to new FC_PORTSPEED semantics Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] zfcp: Make trace record tags unique Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] zfcp: Bounds checking for deferred error trace Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] zfcp: Do not wakeup while suspended Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] zfcp: remove invalid reference to list iterator variable Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` Steffen Maier [this message]
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] zfcp: No automatic port_rescan on events Steffen Maier
2012-09-04 13:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] zfcp: only access zfcp_scsi_dev for valid scsi_device Steffen Maier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120904132348.845821668@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).