From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_netlink: Remove dead and buggy code Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120911.184846.1973557158791638595.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120910.150700.1197774171539303770.davem@davemloft.net> <1347314879.3038.74.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <878vcggp4n.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:48994 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753218Ab2IKWsu (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:48:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878vcggp4n.fsf@xmission.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: ebiederm@xmission.com Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, James.Smart@Emulex.Com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:40:08 -0700 > So just for curiosity I searched the entire git history for scsi_nl_add_ > and the only commit that I found was the addition of that code to the > tree in August of 2008. > > Does anyone have any reason to keep scsi_nl_add_transport or > scsi_nl_add_driver that have never been used in the 4 years since > they have been added? That's basically the question on the table right now :-)