linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 05:45:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121202134515.GJ15930@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B608C1.6080803@acm.org>

Hello, Bart.

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:51:13PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> SCSI LLDs may start cleaning up host resources needed by their
> queuecommand() callback as soon as scsi_remove_host() finished.
> Hence scsi_remove_host() must wait until blk_cleanup_queue() for
> all devices associated with the host has finished. That avoids
> that queuecommand() gets invoked after scsi_remove_host()
> finished. Also, avoid adding new SCSI devices after
> scsi_remove_host() started.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
> Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/hosts.c      |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h  |    1 +
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c |    1 +
>  include/scsi/scsi_host.h  |    1 +
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> index 6ae16cd..7bd944e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> @@ -150,12 +150,31 @@ int scsi_host_set_state(struct Scsi_Host *shost, enum scsi_host_state state)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_set_state);
>  
> +/* Return true if and only if scsi_remove_host() is allowed to finish. */
> +static bool __scsi_remove_host_done(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(shost->host_lock);
> +
> +	return list_empty(&shost->__devices);
> +}

This is a preference thing but I usually find this type of trivial
wrappers more obfuscating than actually helpful.  Dunno what James's
preference is tho.

> +/* Test whether scsi_remove_host() may finish, and if so, wake it up. */
> +void __scsi_check_remove_host_done(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(shost->host_lock);
> +
> +	if (__scsi_remove_host_done(shost))
> +		wake_up(&shost->remove_host);
> +}

Why the __ prefix?  It's not like they have different
external/internal versions.

This being an one-time thing.  Using completion could be simpler.  e.g.

scsi_check_no_device_left()
{
	if (list_empty(__devices))
		complete(host->no_device_left);
}

scsi_remove_host()
{
	blah blah;
	scsi_check_remove_host_done();
	wait_for_completion(&host->no_device_left);
	blah blah;
}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-02 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-28 12:39 [PATCH 0/13 v6] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] block: Rename queue dead flag Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:43 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] block: Let blk_drain_queue() caller obtain the queue lock Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] block: Avoid that request_fn is invoked on a dead queue Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:23   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 13:35     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] block: Avoid scheduling delayed work " Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:26   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 13:41     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:59       ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:46 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] block: Make blk_cleanup_queue() wait until request_fn finished Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:28   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] bsg: Remove unused function bsg_goose_queue() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:29   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:32   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:34   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:35   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:45   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-12-02 13:48     ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-03  8:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-03 16:15       ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-03 16:38         ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-03 16:42           ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-07  7:41             ` Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:52 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:51   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:53   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] Do not queue new I/O after scsi_remove_host() started Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:58   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 14:02 ` [PATCH 0/13 v6] More device removal fixes Tejun Heo
2012-12-06 13:33 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121202134515.GJ15930@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).