From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] block: Avoid scheduling delayed work on a dead queue Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 05:59:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20121202135925.GO15930@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <50B60619.4080406@acm.org> <50B60784.1080604@acm.org> <20121202132613.GD15930@mtj.dyndns.org> <50BB5A80.5010600@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:52869 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751690Ab2LBN7a (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:59:30 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p5so925323dak.19 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 05:59:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50BB5A80.5010600@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-scsi , James Bottomley , Mike Christie , Jens Axboe , Chanho Min , Hannes Reinecke Hello, Bart. On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:41:20PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > I agree. There is a reason though I have not yet added a > lockdep_assert_held() statement in these functions: there are still > unprotected calls of blk_run_queue_async() in drivers/md/dm.c and > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c. Hmmm... that's nasty. Any chance you can fix them up too? Thanks! -- tejun