linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ 11/11] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition
Date: Thu,  6 Dec 2012 16:57:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207005616.809919764@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207005613.189054768@linuxfoundation.org>

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

commit 6d9359280753d2955f86d6411047516a9431eb51 upstream.

Sometimes, warnings about ioctls to partition happen often enough that they
form majority of the warnings in the kernel log and users complain. In some
cases warnings are about ioctls such as SG_IO so it's not good to get rid of
the warnings completely as they can ease debugging of userspace problems
when ioctl is refused.

Since I have seen warnings from lots of commands, including some proprietary
userspace applications, I don't think disallowing the ioctls for processes
with CAP_SYS_RAWIO will happen in the near future if ever. So lets just
stop warning for processes with CAP_SYS_RAWIO for which ioctl is allowed.

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>
CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/scsi_ioctl.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -722,11 +722,14 @@ int scsi_verify_blk_ioctl(struct block_d
 		break;
 	}
 
+	if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* In particular, rule out all resets and host-specific ioctls.  */
 	printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
 			   "%s: sending ioctl %x to a partition!\n", current->comm, cmd);
 
-	return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : -ENOTTY;
+	return -ENOTTY;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_verify_blk_ioctl);
 



           reply	other threads:[~2012-12-07  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20121207005613.189054768@linuxfoundation.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121207005616.809919764@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).