From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>, Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] libfc: fix REC handling
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:22:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121212232209.13084.12509.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121212232203.13084.3630.stgit@fritz>
From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Currently fc_fcp_timeout doesn't check FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED
flag first, this prevents REC request ever going out at all
to the target having REC support. So this patches fixes the
fc_fcp_timeout by checking FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED flag first.
The changed order won't cause any issue during clearing
FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED on failed IO with target not supporting
FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED, since retry on failed IO would succeed.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
index fcb9d0b..09c81b2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
@@ -1381,10 +1381,10 @@ static void fc_fcp_timeout(unsigned long data)
fsp->state |= FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
- if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
- fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp);
- else if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
+ if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
fc_fcp_rec(fsp);
+ else if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
+ fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp);
else
fc_fcp_recovery(fsp, FC_TIMED_OUT);
fsp->state &= ~FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 23:22 [PATCH 00/16] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for 3.8 Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` Robert Love [this message]
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 02/16] Documentation: Add missing devices/ to devices path Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 03/16] libfcoe: Save some memory and optimize name lookups Robert Love
2012-12-13 7:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-14 18:36 ` Love, Robert W
2012-12-14 22:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Robert Love
2012-12-17 14:26 ` Neil Horman
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 04/16] libfcoe: Add fcoe_sysfs debug logging level Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 05/16] libfcoe, fcoe, bnx2fc: Add new fcoe control interface Robert Love
2012-12-16 19:50 ` Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 06/16] fcoe: Use the fcoe_sysfs " Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 07/16] bnx2fc: " Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 08/16] libfc, libfcoe, fcoe: Convert debug_logging macros to pr_info Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 09/16] fcoe: prep work to start consolidate the usage of fcoe_netdev Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 10/16] fcoe: add support to the get_netdev() for fcoe_interface Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 11/16] libfcoe, fcoe: move fcoe_link_speed_update() to libfcoe and export it Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 12/16] libfcoe, fcoe: consolidate the fcoe_ctlr_get_lesb/fcoe_get_lesb Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 13/16] bnx2fc: add support to get_netdev for bnx2f_interface Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 14/16] bnx2fc: use fcoe_link_speed_update() from the exported symbol in libfcoe Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 15/16] bnx2fc: use fcoe_get_lesb/fcoe_ctlr_get_lesb() directly from libfcoe Robert Love
2012-12-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 16/16] debris left by "[SCSI] libfcoe: Remove mutex_trylock/restart_syscall checks" Robert Love
2012-12-16 19:56 ` [PATCH 00/16] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for 3.8 Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121212232209.13084.12509.stgit@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.b.brattain@intel.com \
--cc=vasu.dev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).