From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: attach scsi_dh during table resume
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:37:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130425153757.GB2488@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51794B67.2000903@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 25 2013 at 11:27am -0400,
Bryn M. Reeves <bmr@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/25/2013 03:50 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>The handler that is automatically attached _should_ be the correct
> >>handler.  We now have the .match() hook for scsi_dh and it has made for
> >>reliable scsi_dh attachment of the correct handler.
> >
> >The EMC devices work with both ALUA and EMC handlers - so there is no one
> >"correct" handler, the correct handler is the one that the user specified
> >in multipath configuration.
> 
> I think it's more absolute than that; if a Clariion array is in
> failover mode 4 (ALUA) then it's incorrect to use scsi_dh_emc and
> vice-versa.
> 
> The user can configure this in multipath.conf but it does not make
> it correct. The correct handler is the one that matches the
> configured failover mode of the array.
> 
> The ALUA handler scsi_device_tgps() in its match function but since
> the scsi_dh_emc match function only looks at the vendor/product it's
> impossible for it to make the correct decision.
> 
> The array can tell us what mode it's running in - teaching
> scsi_dh_emc to do this would seem to be an improvement.
clariion_match does more than check the vendor and product; if tpgs is
set (ALUA mode) it returns false.
So yes, while there is room for improvement in clariion_match the
current code should work just fine with reasoning between emc and alua.
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-25 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130404131631.GA10208@redhat.com>
2013-04-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] [SCSI] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_alloc_data Mike Snitzer
2013-04-08 21:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: attach scsi_dh during table resume Mike Snitzer
2013-04-22 22:33     ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 13:48       ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 14:17         ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 14:50           ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 15:27             ` Bryn M. Reeves
2013-04-25 15:37               ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-04-25 15:44                 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2013-04-25 15:31             ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-26  6:05               ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-26 13:29                 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130425153757.GB2488@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bmr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).