From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] scsi-mq prototype discussion Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:02:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20130712010223.GA15673@kroah.com> References: <1373588612.7397.447.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1373588612.7397.447.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Jens Axboe , James Smart , linux-scsi , LKML , James Bottomley , Andrew Vasquez , kmo@daterainc.com, target-devel , Hannes Reinecke , Tejun Heo , Christoph Hellwig , scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:23:32PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Drilling down the work items ahead of a real mainline push is high on > priority list for discussion. > > The parties to be included in such a discussion are: > > - Jens Axboe (blk-mq author) > - James Bottomley (scsi maintainer) > - Christoph Hellwig (scsi) > - Martin Petersen (scsi) > - Tejun Heo (block + libata) > - Hannes Reinecke (scsi error recovery) > - Kent Overstreet (block, per-cpu ida) > - Stephen Cameron (scsi-over-pcie driver) > - Andrew Vasquez (qla2xxx LLD) > - James Smart (lpfc LLD) Isn't this something that should have been discussed at the storage mini-summit a few months ago? It seems very specific to one subsystem to be a kernel summit topic, don't you think? thanks, greg k-h