From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>, Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/9] New EH command timeout handler
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:27:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130902082728.GA15554@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378105985-79686-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
One thing I'm still wondering is why we can't enable this globally,
and if there is a reason it should be documented.
As far as I can tell the actual calling context of the eh_abort_handler
doesn't change, so an LLDD would have to rely on some very specific
side effects of being in EH to break, and we never guaranteed such
specifics.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 7:12 [PATCHv5 0/9] New EH command timeout handler Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] scsi: Fix erratic device offline during EH Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:12 ` [PATCH 2/9] blk-timeout: add BLK_EH_SCHEDULED return code Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:12 ` [PATCH 3/9] scsi: improved eh timeout handler Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 12:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-09-02 13:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 16:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-09-03 9:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-09-04 7:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] virtio_scsi: Enable new EH " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] libsas: " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] mptsas: " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] mpt2sas: " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] mpt3sas: " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 7:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] scsi_transport_fc: " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-09-02 8:54 ` [PATCHv5 0/9] New EH command " Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-02 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-09-02 9:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-03 16:36 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130902082728.GA15554@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renmx@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).